Handwritings that are questioned or become in dispute are also on a wide range of documents. Handwriting includes the totality of the writings such as dates, numbers, symbols, and other markings.
Anonymous writings are a special category of handwriting. These writings often include language with the purpose of hurting another person, or class of persons, either through physical harm or hurting that person’s reputation in the workplace or community. This kind of letter is rarely signed or when signed, the writer includes a pseudonym such as the well-known case of the letters signed as Zodiac. Anonymous writings are often written on different surfaces such as walls, poles, or objects at work. We’ve even had anonymous writing on a plunger!!! Different types of writing instruments are used such as spray paint, markers, and lipstick. Anonymous letters often contain disguised writing to throw off investigations. When the anonymous writings include extensive writing, it is advisable that the document examiner process these writings using a software program. Write-On 3.0 is one example of a specialty software program used to analyze anonymous writings. Frequently, these cases are very sensitive and require an experienced document examiner to handle them.
Common types of anonymous writings
In a criminal case, a young man was accused of being an accomplice to a murder his mother committed based on a note that was signed, “Mom.” An examination of the writing in the original note and the original writings of the son over a period of time showed that there were significant and unexplained differences between the two writings that could not be explained by an attempt at disguise. One example of an unexplained difference that was fundamental to the structure of the writing was present in the small “o’s.” There were 24 small “o’s” in the letter signed as “Mom.” There were more than 24 “o’s” in the son’s writing. The son consistently formed his “o’s” with an individualized habit with the emphasis on the right that often contain an angled configuration in contrast to the tightly constricted 24 small “o’s” in the note that did not contain this characteristic.
To reduce the subjectivity of examining extended writings, the Pikaso Software, Inc. program, Write-On 3.0, is an excellent tool. Once the documents are transcribed into the program, each word, number and symbol can be compared. Writings can be intra-compared, as well as compared with the writings of others. The following exhibits illustrate how it is easy to believe that the writing on the left is the same writer as on the right because of the similarities in the writing.
However, a closer comparison of letters illustrates that there are differences seen in the letters “k.” The “k’s” on the left are from the Zodiac letters. The “k’s” on the right are from the main suspect’s writing, Arthur Lee Allen.
Words that have been transcribed can be intra-compared or compared with each other. All words “Zodiac” in the exhibit below were from the Zodiac letters.
The ‘Compare’ function allows each example to be compared individually with the top image. This process can also be reversed.
Copyright 2023 Fisher Forensic Document Laboratory, Inc.
All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy
— Michael J. McLaughlin, Esq.
Landlord – Evictions and Unlawful Detainer Actions
“Patricia Fisher was selected by joint agreement of my opposing counsel, who represented a government entity, and me, to conduct a questioned document examination to determine if a disputed signature on a document was that of my client, or another person who had denied signing the document. She performed the examination in a prompt fashion, and her ultimate conclusions were clearly and thoroughly explained and well-supported in a detailed report provided to both parties. Ultimately, her report let to an evidentiary hearing before an arbitrator where Ms. Fisher testified about her work, the opinions she reached concerning the signature, and provided the basis for those opinions. The arbitrator who presided over the matter found that Ms. Fisher’s work, ultimate conclusions, and testimony were entitled to great weight and made findings consistent with her opinions. I would not hesitate to call upon Ms. Fisher in the future and an objective and thorough analysis of a disputed signature.”
— Michael L. Rains, Esq.
Criminal Defense
““Our firm retained M. Patricia Fisher as an expert in a marital dissolution proceeding. A well respected trial judge (now retired) in the San Francisco Bay area who presided for several years in the “Complex Civil Trial” Department, found that Ms. Fisher’s analysis was more thorough than the opposing expert, more credible, and more worthy of belief. …
— Greg C. Abel, Esq.
Family Law
“Patricia Fisher’s initial review and opinion of relevant documents concerning the authenticity of a signature on a will resulted in my accepting a case in 2020 that was recently resolved very favorably for my client. Ms. Fisher’s expertise, dedication, insight and continued communication throughout the litigation were invaluable. I can’t express how truly grateful I am that Patricia Fisher was willing and able to provide her expertise. I whole heartedly recommend her.”
— Holley H. Perez, Esq.
Probate
“It was because of you and your wonderful work. Everyone agreed that the writing was the grantors and the court entered and order affirming the changes on the trust. I will recommend you to anyone who needs hand writing analysis. I am so happy we found you.”
— Joan Grimes, Esq.
Probate
“My firm retained Ms. Fisher to establish that certain key documents were not signed by my client. Her testimony during our jury trial was without a doubt critical to our success. Her demonstratives and clarity at trial were hugely beneficial for the jury. Thank you for your professionalism, expertise, and effectiveness.”
— Kyle Monte de Oca, Esq.
Legal Malpractice
“Trustworthy and reliable; Patricia was my hired expert in a recent trial and was able to help us prove our claims to the court even though we had a short deadline and a high burden to meet. I would work with her again and recommend hiring her.”
— Suzanne A. Tong, Esq.
Family Law
“I have personally worked with Patricia on a very complicated case that was litigated in Contra Costa County. She was of great help to my client and the Court in analyzing documents and giving testimony. She had a PowerPoint presentation that explained how she arrived at her expert opinion and conclusions. We were very fortunate to have her participate in this case. I highly recommend Fisher Forensic Documentary Laboratory and would use these services again.”
— Debra H. Kirk, Esq.
Family Law
“I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you and to let you know what a brilliant job you did. Clearly, you were very thorough and diligent in your methods and as a result, your testimony was delivered in terms that were clear and concise. I was remarkably impressed. I couldn’t have asked for a better witness.”
— Suzanne
Client in a probate case
“Because of her strong background in litigated matters, her tremendous work ethic in research and preparation, and her creativity, our firm classifies Patricia Fisher with the highest rating of any of the professional experts we deal with in these matters. She recently allowed us to prevail in a case against the adverse opinions of two other experts. Her testimony was so clear and forceful along with her excellent graphics that it essentially made the day for our position that the will was a forgery.”
– Stanley Pedder, Esq.
Probate
Lafayette, CA
“I thank you for the work you did. I thought it was brilliant.”
– Barbara R. Simon
Licensed Professional Fiduciary
San Francisco, CA
“You recently served as my expert witness in a will forgery case. The case was complicated by the loss of several originals by a third party, and a decline in health by the testator during the period in question.
You were of enormous assistance to me, not only in analyzing the documents in question, but also helping focus discovery and in obtaining appropriate handwriting samples from the witnesses and beneficiaries involved. Although the opposing party consulted three other document examiners, the case settled three days after I presented just a summary of your report.
You have earned the deep gratitude of my client and myself, and I recommend you without reservation for any questioned documents case.”
– Rick Seim, Esq.
Milpitas, CA
“Ms. Fisher provided excellent analysis in a very difficult and complex matter requiring the evaluation of many important amendments to a trust document which disinherited two parties of about $2 million in assets. Her testimony was particularly impressive and helpful when compared to the opposing expert. I strongly recommend her.”
– Bradley A. Bening, Esq.
San Jose, CA
“You have set the standard for what I expect of an expert – someone passionate, meticulous, knowledgeable, and of the highest integrity. Thank you so much for all your help in our case.”
– Ben E. Dupré, Esq.
Santa Clara, CA
“Ms. Fisher is one of the most intelligent, pleasant, and convincing experts we’ve ever used.”
– Mark Hooshmand, Esq.
San Francisco, CA
“Patricia Fisher is a highly competent, thorough and credible questioned document examiner. She is so well respected that the District Attorney called her as his witness before she even testified on my client’s behalf – and her testimony resulted in an immediate dismissal for my client. I cannot say enough good things about Ms. Fisher’s work.”
– Henry H. Doering, III
San Francisco Deputy Public Defender (retired)
“…the court agreed with your conclusion that the questioned signature on the guaranty at issue was not genuine. It was quite evident that, solely due to your testimony, we prevailed on that issue.
I was extremely impressed by your professional integrity, meticulous investigation and examination of the documents in question, and your demeanor on the witness stand. We were also very appreciative of your prompt turnaround time, and willingness to meet our scheduling demands.”
– John MacConaghy, Esq.
Sonoma, CA
“Patricia Fisher is one of the best forensic handwriting (document, paper, ink, impressions) experts I have ever used. Her report and trial testimony were very credible.”
– Jerome Blaha, Esq.
Pleasanton, California
Special Recommendation
“Allow me to take this opportunity to thank you on behalf of my mother whom you have assisted in testifying during the trial in San Jose with such dedication, accuracy, and professionalism. Our expert in Japan agreed with your analysis.”
– Dr. Iri Sato-Baran
Japan
With few exceptions, Patricia Fisher works directly with the attorney or law firm, rather than with the individual client. This is important to protect the privilege for both the client and the case. Once Ms. Fisher has been listed as an expert, there is no longer a privilege. Everything is discoverable from the initial phone call. Working directly with the attorney Ms. Fisher can focus on the documents in question as the attorney knows the law and has certain confidential client attorney privileges. The attorney can obtain or subpoena any additional documents that will be necessary which an individual cannot do. Working with the attorney helps reduce potential bias. Individual clients usually want to tell their whole story to the document examiner not realizing that they are potentially eliminating the examiner from assisting them.
If your attorney has asked you to locate a document examiner, please make a brief call so that we can provide you the information your attorney will need.
We realize that when documents are at issue such as in financial elder abuse cases or child custody cases, the stories can be horrifying. However, a forensic document examiner’s job is to be objective and reduce any task unrelated information.
As an example, if you believe your brother killed your elder mother to get her money, this is unrelated information for the document examiner. On the other hand if you believe your brother forged your elder mother’s signature on a Deed of Trust, the task related information would sound like this, “We need a document examiner to determine if our elder mother signed the Deed of Trust.” Notice that you are not deciding the end result by saying, “We know our brother forged the Deed of Trust.” The latter is a discoverable statement that the opposing counsel can use against the examiner.